Skip to main content

The Innovator's Dilemma

So, I ran into this book on someone's site and I thought it looked like something I should read. Now, it is almost 10 years old, and since many of the examples Christensen uses to illustrate his points are now in the realm of the historical--and since the book goes into fairly great technical detail about the affected industries, the book doesn't read as easily as it might have once.

However, the book is still really relevant because of the principles it uncovers. For one thing, Christensen coined the term "disruptive technology," which has become a very common way of speaking about the topic. Quoted below, from the oracle of wiki:
a disruptive technology is a new technological innovation, product, or service that eventually overturns the existing dominant technology in the market, despite the fact that the disruptive technology is both radically different from the leading technology and that it often initially performs worse than the leading technology according to existing measures of performance.
So the point of the book is simple. Big companies, by being good at what big companies do best (think process optimization, good controls, etc.) put themselves at risk for being overturned by the latest and greatest "disruptive technology." Basically, the company gives others the tools to compete effectively and beat them at their own game (or at least knock the wind out of them). In a nutshell that's it.

Clayton makes this argument in The Innovator's Dilemma, but then I need to read the next book, The Innovator's Solution, to figure out what one is supposed to do in these situations.

Update: Here's a great link from CIO that has an interview with Christensen.

Another update: Upon further questioning of the wiki oracle, I found this to be quotable--which treats what to do if you find yourself being disrupted:
Christensen recommends that existing firms watch for these technologies, invest in small firms that might produce them, and continue to push technological demands in their core market so that performance stays above what disruptive technologies can achieve.
Okay, sorry, one more update: Just came across this relevant tidbit from the New York Times via Signal vs Noise, where they're talking about Craigslist "underdoing" Microsoft.

The Innovator's Dilemma, by Clayton Christensen
ISBN # 0875845851

Popular posts from this blog

An Army of Davids

So, I've been spending some time with Glenn Reynold's book (Glenn being of course the seminal and highly influential Instapundit ), and I must say that it gives me lots of language I can use to talk about phenomena that are easily observable right now. I think you could say that Glenn Reynolds has done for technology what Virginia Postrel did with design topics . Which is to say, they beat the drum and say, hey, look at what this democratization of knowledge can do for you! In that vein, the book is really pretty visionary, pointing out the magic of the internet age. And I for one see it as magical. You know how Laura Ingalls Wilder's Pa in Little Town on the Prairie said to Laura that it was an amazing time to be alive (that was in the 1890s)? I've been actively thinking that to myself for the past few years, and An Army of Davids gives me ample evidence to back that up with its talk of citizen empowerment and the "comfy chair revolution." The theme of ...

Managing the Nonprofit Organization (Part Three)

1. What is the bottom line when there is no bottom line? Businesses as a default can rely on profit as an effectiveness measure. Nonprofits cannot use this concrete measure meaningfully. There are many different ways of looking at measurements that can serve as bottom lines of sorts, but the trick is to pick the right measurement to look at. And that can change over time, so it needs to be incorporated into the strategic planning (or whatever you want to call it) process. Nonprofits have many different customers which all need to be pleased to differing degrees. Drucker talks about the difficulty nonprofits have abandoning lost causes. Nonprofits have to distinguish between moral causes and economic causes. A moral cause is an absolute good. Preachers have been thundering against fornication for five thousand years. Results, alas, have been nil, but that only proves how deeply entrenched evil is. The absence of results indicates only that efforts have to be increased. This is the essen...

Public sector information design

Here's an article from the UK's Design Council talking about how information design is important in public-sector efforts. Of course, it's helpful to everyone, but this is a good example of the universal need for better presentation of information--and more design.